We’ve recently visited two of the “must see” places in Hyderabad. One was the Golconda fort and the other was the Chowmahalla Palace. Fortunately we saw them in chronological order rather than alphabetical which helped put the two places into historical perspective. However, in the news recently, we have to talk about hysterical perspectives as the verdict just handed down in a legal case that is 60 years old is creating tensions between the Hindu and Muslim communities. Our two visits put the reasons why Hyderabad was an important center for the Persians, Moguls, and British over the last 1400 years. Yep, the Persians were here in the seventh century bringing trade and Islam to the area from the west. You also read in an earlier posting that it was purported that St. Thomas, yep, that “show me” disciple of Jesus, came to Chennai to first bring Christianity to India. He was martyred for that. Now pulling in
The Persian rulers were the occupants of the Golconda (shepherd’s hill).
They were drawn here by the abundance of precious metals and diamonds. From the 14th century to the 16th century, five generation
Now after the Moguls established themselves as the rulers and did make nice with the British, the new Nizams took advantage of the wealth that was available in the area. In the later part of the 19th century, they began to construct the Chowmahalla Palace which was the seat of the last four Nizams. I believe Chowmahalla is a Mogul term for “It’s great to be King”. But you’ll have to judge for yourselves: Medieval fort or opulent palace. Pick one.
Just like the issues dealing with the 60 year old legal case where a mosque was built on the site of a former Hindu temple and, sparing you all the details, the two groups claimed their right to the site. Interestingly, in the fort, constructed by the Persian Nizam, there is a Hindu temple with a structure outside it that looks like something you'd see on the third floor of MOMA. The contrast of its verticality with the litter that gets caught in the structure gives it that gritty modernity that comes alive and vibrantly represents the lingering tension of deeply held feelings of the ethnic religiosity versus the power structure based on a credo belief. Oh, sorry, I was channelling a docent we saw at the Whitney who was explaining a Jasper Johns' work to a group of Japanese tourists.
No comments:
Post a Comment